However, on our client's computer, they encountered such MFC80.DLL problem and the specific version is 7.6195. While on my testing machine, whether VC++ Redist Packs installed doesn't influence our application's running. Side-by-side VCRedist is just a nightmare.Īctually, I was dealing with such horrible case - one of our older product needs VC++ 2005 Runtime Library and our developer indicated 'side-by-side' includes of Reference: with publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b" & You may be dealing with a corrupted installation on that machine, and it may require some advanced repair efforts to get things cleaned up. Also, if your app was built with VC++ 8.0 (VS 2005), itĭoesn't matter what DLLs you have installed for later VC++ versions. Likewise, if your program is 64-bit, it doesn't matter what x86 DLLs you have installed. If your program is built for 32-bit, it doesn't matter what 圆4 DLLs you have installed. But it's always possible that somebody goofed and released something with a bad version number at some point during those days of pain and frustration. I know only of the ones with 50608Īnd 50727 in their numbers, with 50727.6195 being the latest I'm aware of. That said, I don't know where those versions with 59193 or 61001 came from. The headaches you are describing go away from VS 2010 and up (2012, 2013, 2015.).Īs I mentioned to RLWA32, a policy redirection will cause the newest version to be used anyway, so keeping older versions is of no use. My first and foremost recommendation is to get away from VS 2005 and move up to something more recent.
MICROSOFT VISUAL C 2010 SP1 REDISTRIBUTABLE PACKAGE X64 DOWNLOAD
If the answer is Yes, then how can I download this older installation pack? So I would like to know if this version 5 is still under support? I already installed 2005,2008,2010 redist packages and I failed to download Microsoft VisualĬ++ 2013 Redistributable (x86) 5 from Microsoft Official Site. I suspect this is compatibility problem and I am trying to re-create this issue in virtual environment. Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable (1) Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable (3) Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable (圆4) (7.42) - Actually it's 2005 SP1 ALT Sec Update, 7.6195 isn't shown in Program list. Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable (圆4) (0) Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable - 圆4 (9.4148) Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable - 圆4 (9.6161) Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable - x86 (9.4148) Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable - x86 (9.6161) Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 圆4 Redistributable (9)
Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 x86 Redistributable (9) Microsoft Visual C++ 2013 Redistributable (圆4) (5.1) Microsoft Visual C++ 2013 Redistributable (x86) (5.1) What I already know is that, on the specific machine, there are too many redist packages installed : I am resolving a case related with C++ Redistributable Packages compatibility.
0 kommentar(er)
